Hydrogen cars attacked by US motoring guru
No future for the alternative fuel source claims ex CIA boss

UK car bosses have been told there is no future in hydrogen-powered cars as replacements for petrol and diesel models.

The warning came from James Woolsey, a former CIA chief and now chairman of the US Clean Fuels Foundation, to members of the SMMT in London.

Woolsey claims hydrogen fuel pumps are too expensive
Woolsey claims hydrogen fuel pumps are too expensive

Woolsey launched a blistering attack on the US government for investing in what he views as the wrong technology and criticised California governor Arnold Schwarzenegger's move to establish a so-called Hydrogen Highway of refuelling stations in the state.

"Single worst decision"

“Hydrogen and fuel cells are not the way to go. The decision by the Bush administration and the State of California to follow the Hydrogen Highway is the single worst decision in the past few years,” he said.

“In the meantime you have to bring down the cost of a fuel cell vehicle by a factor of about 40 to make it affordable,” he said.

Woolsey estimated that a hydrogen infrastructure will cost the US $1 trillion and argued that investments in other technologies, including hybrid-electric plug-in vehicles, would be more cost-effective and achievable.

He argued that 78 per cent of US cars clock up less than 40 miles a day and could be recharged overnight during off-peak hours.

“The important thing is that there should be no single solution or decision by governments,” he said.

Email Small Delicious Icon  Delicious Small StumbleUpon Icon  Stumble Upon Small Facebook Icon Facebook Small Google Icon Google Bookmark
HAVE YOUR SAY

Comments
CM says:
Woolsey is right - hydrogen storage is very costly, H2 fuel cells are insanely expensive, and even H2 fuel costs too much. Currently, mass produced compressed H2 costs $8 to $10 "gallon of gas equivalent", that means filling up an expensive H2 car would cost far more than petrol. Per mile fuel costs, even with efficient fuel cells, would also be higher. Driving on electricity would have a fuel cost far below petrol, and 1/5th the cost of H2 fuel. The future is electric.
28 Apr 2008 09:30:19

Jake Behning says:
A $1 trillion investment would not be that bad, seeing as how we're going into a recession anyways regardless of who's president, hydrogen would be a great way to stimulate our economy. think about it, no more buying fuel from the middle east, what you pay for the hydro would be going to what i would hope to be an American business, instead of paying $75 to fill up on fuel, you would hopefully be paying alot less, sh*t $1/gallon would be great. and the difference of what it used to cost you to fill up would probably get spent on something else, hopefully something domestic to stimulate our economy! anybody not interested in hydrogen cars that likes to pay $50+ to fill up should move somewhere else so that us who are sick of being broke from gas prices can be happy. HOORAY FOR HYDRO!
02 Jan 2008 09:53:19

Click on the button to include your comments on this story